Unsatisfactory (2)
|
Satisfactory (3)
|
Excellent (4)
|
|
Group Cooperation
|
Students needed to
be reminded to stay on task frequently.
One or two people did all the work.
Students argued with one another or left some students out of the
process.
|
All students
contributed a fair share to the project, though some workloads varied. Students had to be reminded occasionally to
stay on task. Students made an effort
to include all group members in the process.
|
All students
contributed equally to the video.
Students stayed on task at all times.
Students worked with each other in a friendly manner.
|
Subject Content
|
Subject knowledge
is not evident. Information is
confusing, incorrect, or flawed.
|
Subject knowledge
is evident in much of the video. Most
information is clear, appropriate, and correct.
|
Subject knowledge
is evident throughout the video. All
information is clear, appropriate and correct.
|
Video content and
organization
|
The video lacks a logical
sequence of information. Much of the
information is irrelevant to the story
|
Information is
connected to the story. Details are logical and information is relevant
throughout most of the video
|
Video includes a
clear reenacting of the story. Events and messages are presented in a logical
order, with relevant information that supports the video’s main ideas.
|
Production
|
Video is of poor
quality and is unedited. There are no
transitions added or transitions are used so frequently that they detract
from the video.
|
Tape is
edited. A variety of transitions are
used and most transitions help tell the story. Most of video has good pacing and timing.
|
Tape is
edited. Video runs smoothly from shot
to shot. A variety of transitions are
used to assist in communicating the main idea. Shots and scenes work well together.
|
